State Home Improvement Planning Index
Compare the stored CostSignals planning-index values for all 50 states. A value of 100 is the model reference baseline; differences describe index points, not a guaranteed percentage difference in project prices.
At a Glance: Stored State Values
Highest Model Index
Hawaii (119)
Lowest Model Index
Mississippi (85)
Model Baseline
100 (internal reference)
Highest and Lowest Model Values
Highest Model Values
- 1.Hawaii119
- 2.California115
- 3.New York115
- 4.Massachusetts114
- 5.New Jersey113
Model Baseline
Internal reference for comparison
Mean of stored state values: 98
Lowest Model Values
- 46.Mississippi85
- 47.West Virginia87
- 48.Arkansas87
- 49.Oklahoma88
- 50.Alabama88
Regional Model Summary
Each card is the arithmetic mean of the stored state values assigned to that region. It is a model summary, not a finding about regional market affordability or contractor prices.
Northeast
Average across 9 states
West
Average across 13 states
South
Average across 16 states
Midwest
Average across 12 states
All 50 Stored State Values
Select a state to inspect its position in this internal table and compare it with neighboring-state and selected city model values. Use the column headers to sort.
| Hawaii | 119 |
| California | 115 |
| New York | 115 |
| Massachusetts | 114 |
| New Jersey | 113 |
| Connecticut | 110 |
| Maryland | 109 |
| Washington | 107 |
| Alaska | 106 |
| New Hampshire | 106 |
| Colorado | 105 |
| Oregon | 104 |
| Rhode Island | 103 |
| Vermont | 103 |
| Virginia | 103 |
| Delaware | 101 |
| Nevada | 101 |
| Florida | 100 |
| Utah | 100 |
| Maine | 99 |
| Illinois | 98 |
| Minnesota | 98 |
| Arizona | 97 |
| Pennsylvania | 97 |
| Idaho | 95 |
| Montana | 95 |
| Wyoming | 94 |
| Georgia | 93 |
| North Carolina | 93 |
| Texas | 93 |
| Wisconsin | 93 |
| Michigan | 92 |
| New Mexico | 92 |
| North Dakota | 92 |
| Indiana | 91 |
| Louisiana | 91 |
| Nebraska | 91 |
| Ohio | 91 |
| South Carolina | 91 |
| South Dakota | 91 |
| Tennessee | 91 |
| Iowa | 90 |
| Missouri | 90 |
| Kansas | 89 |
| Kentucky | 89 |
| Alabama | 88 |
| Oklahoma | 88 |
| Arkansas | 87 |
| West Virginia | 87 |
| Mississippi | 85 |
How to Read the Index
- Index 100: the internal reference baseline
- Index 120: 20 index points above the model baseline
- Index 85: 15 index points below the model baseline
Do not apply an index-point difference as a verified price adjustment. Actual bids depend on project scope, materials, labor, permits, timing, and the professionals quoting the work.
Explore More
Frequently Asked Questions
Which state has the highest value in the internal table?
Hawaii has the highest stored state value at 119. That is a rank inside this model, not an official market-price ranking.
Which state has the lowest value in the internal table?
Mississippi has the lowest stored state value at 85. The value does not establish what a specific project will cost.
Can this index predict my project price?
No. It is a directional model input, not an observed price series, contractor quote, bid, or offer. Use detailed project inputs and compare quotes from qualified local professionals.
What source date and update schedule apply to these values?
CostSignals does not document a verified external source tuple, effective date, retrieval date, or update schedule for this static series. The disclosure above is the governing data-status statement.